Sovereign Cloud Compass
Audit reports / evidence pack

Audit reports / evidence pack

Why important?

Without evidence, reviews fail (regulator, internal audit).

How measured?

Scale 0–5 + N/A:
  • 0 = No reports/evidence packs available
  • 1 = Marketing/statements only, no verifiable material
  • 2 = Some artifacts, but incomplete/scope unclear
  • 3 = Evidence pack available (often via portal/NDA), scope partly clear
  • 4 = Comprehensive artifacts (SOC/C5/ISO/reports) with good freshness, few gaps
  • 5 = Comprehensive + current + scope transparent + easily accessible (public/trust center) evidenced
  • N/A = no reliable evidence

Sources / Evidence

Validation questions (RFP)

  • Is there a standardized evidence pack (SOC reports, C5, pen-test summaries)? How quickly available?

Scores comparison

Providers Score
Microsoft Sovereign Cloud 5.0
AWS European Sovereign Cloud 4.0
Exoscale 4.0
Hetzner Cloud 4.0
STACKIT 4.0
Scaleway 4.0
SysEleven OpenStack Cloud 4.0
Cloud Temple Trusted Cloud 4.0 SecNumCloud qualification (ANSSI) = comprehensive audit. ISO 27001 certificate. HDS certificate. Documentation via GitHub (docs). Evidence through SecNumCloud process.
Infomaniak Public Cloud 3.0 ISO 27001:2022 certificate (PDF download). ISO 9001/14001/50001. B Corp certification (2025). No SecNumCloud/C5 audit. Certificates publicly referenced.
T Cloud Public 4.0
pluscloud open 4.0
IONOS Cloud 3.0
OVHcloud Public Cloud (inkl. SecNumCloud) 3.0
Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud 3.0
UpCloud 3.0
noris Sovereign Cloud 3.0
Delos Cloud N/A