Sovereign Cloud Compass
Local contracting entity & EU governance (operational model)

Local contracting entity & EU governance (operational model)

Why important?

Clear contracting party, responsibilities and governance for EU operations/support.

How measured?

Scale 0–5 + N/A:
  • 0 = Contract/responsibility primarily with a non-EU entity
  • 1 = EU contracting claimed, governance/accountability unclear
  • 2 = EU contracting present, but governance/decision rights weak
  • 3 = EU contracting + defined EU governance (roles/boards/accountability)
  • 4 = EU contracting + strong EU governance, clear rights/controls documented
  • 5 = EU contracting + EU governance with real decision/control rights contractually evidenced
  • N/A = no reliable evidence

Validation questions (RFP)

  • Which legal entity is the contracting partner? Which sub-processors? Who decides on government requests?

Scores comparison

Providers Score
Delos Cloud 5.0
SysEleven OpenStack Cloud 5.0
Cloud Temple Trusted Cloud 4.0 Contracting entity: Cloud Temple SAS (FR). French law. SecNumCloud governance per ANSSI requirements. Operational model entirely in FR.
Infomaniak Public Cloud 3.0 Contracting entity: Infomaniak Network SA (CH). Swiss law. Not EU law, but GDPR-compliant. Operational model entirely in CH.
noris Sovereign Cloud 5.0
AWS European Sovereign Cloud 4.0
Hetzner Cloud 4.0
Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud 4.0
STACKIT 4.0
Scaleway 4.0
T Cloud Public 4.0
UpCloud 4.0
pluscloud open 4.0
Exoscale 3.0
IONOS Cloud 3.0
OVHcloud Public Cloud (inkl. SecNumCloud) 3.0
Microsoft Sovereign Cloud 2.0