Sovereign Cloud Compass
Ownership / ultimate parent (EU-owned?)

Ownership / ultimate parent (EU-owned?)

Why important?

Ownership/jurisdiction affects access obligations (e.g., CLOUD Act), governance and audit risk assumptions.

How measured?

Scale 0–5 + N/A:
  • 0 = Ultimate parent clearly non-EU (no EU governance/separation)
  • 1 = Non-EU ultimate parent (EU entity only operational/contracting)
  • 2 = Non-EU parent, but stronger EU structures (e.g., EU subsidiary, limited governance)
  • 3 = EU operations/governance mechanisms exist, ultimate parent remains non-EU
  • 4 = EU-owned, but relevant non-EU influence/control topics (e.g., investors/structure)
  • 5 = Ultimate parent EU-owned (control in the EU)
  • N/A = no reliable evidence

Validation questions (RFP)

  • Who is the ultimate parent? Which corporate/jurisdictional chain applies for disclosure obligations?

Scores comparison

Providers Score
Delos Cloud 5.0
Hetzner Cloud 5.0
IONOS Cloud 5.0
OVHcloud Public Cloud (inkl. SecNumCloud) 5.0
STACKIT 5.0
Scaleway 5.0
SysEleven OpenStack Cloud 5.0
Cloud Temple Trusted Cloud 5.0 CLOUD TEMPLE SAS (FR), headquartered in Puteaux. 100% French company (stated). Investors: Neurones (FR IT group), Poulina Group. No non-EU ultimate parent.
Infomaniak Public Cloud 4.0 Infomaniak Network SA (CH), founded 1994. Majority employee-owned. Founded by Boris Siegenthaler. Headquartered in Geneva, CH. Not EU, but CH/EFTA.
T Cloud Public 5.0
UpCloud 5.0
noris Sovereign Cloud 5.0
Exoscale 3.0
AWS European Sovereign Cloud 1.0
Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud 1.0
pluscloud open 1.0
Microsoft Sovereign Cloud 0.0