Sovereign Cloud Compass
Kriterium

CO₂-/Wasser-Reporting + erneuerbare Energiequellen

Why important?

Transparent measurement and disclosure of CO2e and water, plus sourcing of renewable/low-carbon energy.

How measured?

Scale 0–5 + N/A:
  • 0 = No information on CO₂/water/renewables.
  • 1 = General commitments only, without KPIs/reporting.
  • 2 = Renewable energy mentioned (e.g. "100% green electricity"), but no consistent CO₂/water reporting.
  • 3 = CO₂ reporting in place (at least scope 1–2) and renewables; water only qualitative/partial.
  • 4 = Detailed CO₂ reporting (e.g. incl. scope 3 or methodologically transparent) + renewables; water KPIs/targets partial.
  • 5 = Comprehensive ESG reporting (scope 1–3) incl. renewables (share/methodology) + water KPIs/targets, updated regularly.
  • N/A = Not assessed / no reliable evidence available.

Validation questions (RFP)

These questions help close evidence gaps or verify claims, including scope.

  • How are CO₂/GHG emissions (scope 1–3), energy sourcing (share of renewables, evidence such as GOs/RECs/PPAs) and water use (e.g. WUE) measured and published? Is there a base year, target pathway and external assurance (if any)?

Scores comparison

Providers Score
AWS European Sovereign Cloud 5.0
IONOS Cloud 5.0
Scaleway 5.0
Microsoft Sovereign Cloud 5.0
Infomaniak Public Cloud 5.0 200% CO₂ offsetting (myclimate). 100% renewable energy. Impact Report 2024. ISO 14001. B Corp (2025). Own solar installations. Hardware lifecycle up to 15 years. Canton of Geneva sustainability award (2015, 2023).
OVHcloud Public Cloud (inkl. SecNumCloud) 4.0
T Cloud Public 4.0
Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud 4.0
noris Sovereign Cloud 4.0
STACKIT 3.0
pluscloud open 3.0
UpCloud 3.0
Exoscale 3.0
Hetzner Cloud 3.0
Delos Cloud 3.0
SysEleven OpenStack Cloud 3.0
Cloud Temple Trusted Cloud 1.0 CSR engagement mentioned. No detailed CO₂/water/renewable reports public. No ESG report documented.