Sovereign Cloud Compass
Geographic footprint & redundancy (regions/AZ/DCs in EU/DE)

Geographic footprint & redundancy (regions/AZ/DCs in EU/DE)

Why important?

Operational reality check: number and separation of failure domains, geo-redundancy and DR options within the EU/Germany.

How measured?

Scale 0–5 + N/A:
  • 0 = Single DC / no AZ redundancy
  • 1 = One region, little redundancy
  • 2 = One region with AZs/redundancy, but limited
  • 3 = Several AZs or strong redundancy within the EU (one region)
  • 4 = Several regions in the EU (cross-region redundancy possible)
  • 5 = Several regions incl. EU/Germany focus + high resilience (DR/failover), evidenced
  • N/A = no reliable evidence

Validation questions (RFP)

  • Is there a GA date, SLA, regions/failover within the EU? Which migration paths and tooling exist?

Scores comparison

Providers Score
T Cloud Public 5.0
Microsoft Sovereign Cloud 5.0
IONOS Cloud 4.0
STACKIT 4.0
OVHcloud Public Cloud (inkl. SecNumCloud) 4.0
Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud 4.0
pluscloud open 4.0
UpCloud 4.0
Exoscale 4.0
Hetzner Cloud 4.0
Scaleway 4.0
AWS European Sovereign Cloud 3.0
Delos Cloud 3.0
noris Sovereign Cloud 3.0
SysEleven OpenStack Cloud 3.0
Cloud Temple Trusted Cloud 3.0 1 region (France) with 3 availability zones. DCs in France (locations not public). Plans for expansion to Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Dublin (announced 2024). Currently FR only.
Infomaniak Public Cloud 2.0 DCs in Geneva (canton of Geneva) and Winterthur/Zurich (CH), Tier III+; new DC D4 (Jan 2025) with heat recovery. Footprint limited to Switzerland (limited number of regions).