Sovereign Cloud Compass
Observability (logs/metrics/traces, alerting)

Observability (logs/metrics/traces, alerting)

Why important?

Without logs, metrics and tracing, operations, security monitoring and troubleshooting hardly scale. Observability is a core building block for regulated workloads.

How measured?

Scale 0–5 + N/A:
  • 0 = No or very little observability
  • 1 = Basic logs/metrics, no traces/integration
  • 2 = Partial observability, gaps in integration/export
  • 3 = Good observability for the core scope + export/integration possible
  • 4 = Strong observability suite + governance/retention/export well documented
  • 5 = Comprehensive + mature + verifiably evidenced (incl. security/compliance requirements)
  • N/A = no reliable evidence

Validation questions (RFP)

  • Is end-to-end tracing available? Which retention/export options exist (e.g. bulk export)? IAM/RBAC on telemetry? Audit logs for configuration changes?

Scores comparison

Providers Score
AWS European Sovereign Cloud 5.0
Microsoft Sovereign Cloud 5.0
IONOS Cloud 4.0
STACKIT 4.0
T Cloud Public 4.0
Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud 4.0
Scaleway 4.0
OVHcloud Public Cloud (inkl. SecNumCloud) 3.0
pluscloud open 3.0
Exoscale 3.0
Delos Cloud 3.0
noris Sovereign Cloud 3.0
SysEleven OpenStack Cloud 3.0
Cloud Temple Trusted Cloud 3.0 Console metrics (Grafana-compatible via GraphQL API). Real-time monitoring. Backup monitoring. No dedicated managed observability product (in the style of Datadog/Cockpit).
UpCloud 2.0
Hetzner Cloud 2.0
Infomaniak Public Cloud 2.0 OpenStack Horizon metrics. Infomaniak Manager dashboard. No dedicated managed observability (logs/metrics/traces as a service). Monitoring primarily via the console.