Service portfolio depth
Why important?
Many sovereignty programmes fail for lack of managed services.
How measured?
Scale 0–5 + N/A:
- Derived from core service coverage:
- 0 = Very low (almost no PaaS / <10% coverage)
- 1 = Low (10–30%)
- 2 = Medium (30–50%)
- 3 = Good (50–70%)
- 4 = High (70–90%)
- 5 = Very high / hyperscaler-like (>90%)
- N/A = no reliable evidence
Sources / Evidence
Validation questions (RFP)
- Which must-have services (DB, analytics, AI, IAM, SIEM, KMS, governance tooling) are mandatory? Which roadmap items can be contractually committed?
Scores comparison
| Providers | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| AWS European Sovereign Cloud | 5.0 | |
| Oracle EU Sovereign Cloud | 5.0 | |
| Delos Cloud | 5.0 | |
| Microsoft Sovereign Cloud | 5.0 | |
| T Cloud Public | 4.8 | |
| Scaleway | 4.5 | |
| STACKIT | 4.4 | |
| IONOS Cloud | 4.1 | |
| OVHcloud Public Cloud (inkl. SecNumCloud) | 3.4 | |
| Cloud Temple Trusted Cloud | 3.1 | IaaS (VMware + OpenIaaS/XEN), PaaS (OpenShift), object storage (S3), block storage, backup, databases (PostgreSQL, MariaDB), Kafka, Kubernetes, LLMaaS, bastion, anti-DDoS, network (VPN/firewall), marketplace. Growing portfolio; not yet at hyperscaler breadth. |
| Exoscale | 2.7 | |
| Infomaniak Public Cloud | 2.7 | Compute (CPU/GPU instances), block storage, object storage (S3), managed Kubernetes, database as a service (MariaDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Redis), load balancer, VPC/private network, DNS, AI/LLM services. Growing portfolio since 2025. |
| UpCloud | 2.6 | |
| SysEleven OpenStack Cloud | 2.5 | |
| Hetzner Cloud | 1.9 | |
| pluscloud open | 1.8 | |
| noris Sovereign Cloud | 1.5 |